What level food hygiene do i need (2 sources)

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through the estate's fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

2 of the 17 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 15 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 1 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in day (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 7 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

Derivation as chartered: one row per jurisdiction per duty, quoted verbatim from that jurisdiction's own instrument with its effective date: what must be held (nothing named, a card, a supervisor certificate), who must hold it, the deadline in days from hire, the validity period in years, whether one certified person must be present during operating hours, and the exemptions.

The figure no authority publishes is the CONTRAST - that GB names no qualification at all while Texas gives 30 days and two years, California 30 days and three years, Australia five years, Ontario one trained person per operating hour - and the count of jurisdictions in each class.

It is also the correction the market needs: the GB row is the answer to 'what level food hygiene do I need' and it is not a level.

Changed-since on every rate-year turn or amendment

7 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.